top of page
Feuer

To person

The Heinz Hermann Faßbender case

 

---> Explanation <---

from 02.26.2021 from

Klaus Overhoff &

Volker Hoffmann

 

---> Explanation <---

from 12/14 March 2021 from

Klaus Overhoff

 

Heinz%20Fa%C3%9Fbender%20ohne%20LG%20Gie

T:   02268 - 90 74 76

M: 0152 - 3368 7417

Kürten - Rastatt

3 h 44 min (334 km) on the A5 and A3

 

separate Carl-Benz-Strasse 20 in 76437 Rastatt from Kastanienweg 23 in 51515 Kürten, where a "reporter" Heinz Hermann Faßbender lives in a cul-de-sac, married to Michael Narang. The homosexual Heinz Faßbender is said to have a son by the name of Christian Faßbender, because he sometimes indicates in his place in the exchange of identity when it comes to open claims or hiding his home addresses, in other words: mailbox addresses.

 

Or is it about this Christian Faßbender , into whose identity Heinz Faßbender slips when he, abusing press law, wants to escape the prosecution authorities?

 

For decades he has appeared under the aliases Max Maier, Christian Faßbender and numerous Polish names that he randomly picks up on the Internet in order not to have to pay his traffic fines, for example.

 

At the police station in Kürten, police chief inspector Jürgen Farsen , he has been well known for years, but also at the public prosecutor's office in Baden-Baden , where he was for years in Weinbergstrasse. 7 reported where he never lived, even registered his car there, ... he is said to be on record with the public prosecutor's offices in Hamburg, Cologne, Heilbronn, etc.

 

Now this "busy reporter" in Rastatt has taken on the party member of the Greens Uta Böllinger in order to degrade the father of their daughter on his website and in the Rastatt Facebook group to the worst. He questions the word "together".

 

What does this mean exactly?

 

Faßbender has been working closely with the incitement journeyman Nikolaus Sehr, Erlenstrasse 13, 76547 Sinzheim, since November 2019, who in turn appeared in 2016 as the inciting journeyman of Ms. Böllinger, according to Mr. Sehr's multiple own confirmation, and demonstrably falsely claims that Horse property of the Fritz family moved via the Moseshof in Dill would have belonged to T + M Agrar-Objekt GmbH, which is in liquidation.

 

For this purpose, Mr. Sehr submitted a false affidavit in this regard to the Bühl District Court on June 1, 2016. The horses were never owned by the company, as can be seen from the balance sheets and contracts.

 

As agreed with Ms. Uta Böllinger in 2016, after several confirmations by Mr. Sehr, Mr. Holger Fritz was always untruely declared as homeless by the activists by imputing mailbox addresses. One of the underlying intentions was z. B. to get titles about default judgments, since Mr. Holger Fritz never learned of a complaint about this criminal practice.

 

In some cases the activists succeeded in doing this, but the courts corrected this after clarifying the facts. The fraud statements by Sehr, Böllinger, Bayer, Schäfers, etc., were either revoked or no longer played a role.

 

All of this is of no interest to character assassination experts such as Faßbender, Sehr, Böllinger, Bayer, Schäfers & Co.

 

These activists can never pay for their damage done - they are envious prone nots - make this tool available as well as publish: "Should the Fritz but complain, we have already been lifted finger, have nothing and doing the Baden justice nothing," said Statements from the perpetrator and debtor community.

 

With this criminal trick, these envious people wanted to and have unrestrainedly enriched themselves with the property of the Fritz family, which was achieved, for example, with the sale of horse property worth over € 300,000.00 as stolen goods.

 

It also shows the cold feeling of these fences, who unscrupulously moved the horses of Mr. Fritz's children.

 

As is the case with habenichtsen, Holger Fritz's complaint was not pursued by the StA Baden-Baden because of, for example, embezzlement of a horse's assets of over € 300,000 , as the instigator Nikolaus Sehr can expect a conviction for other offenses. Even a property offense of over € 800,000.00, for T + M Agrar -objekt GmbH alone, does not matter - at least for the StA Baden-Baden!

 

If one were to collect the assets of all instigators and incitement fellows, including the newly added inciting fellow Fassbender, plus Ser. Income of the group over 30 years of fictional basis, this debtor Community (Very, Fassbender, Böllinger, Lihl, Bayer, Ludewig, etc.) nowhere near able to ever make up for the damage caused.

 

For example, Mr Sehr has a criminal record with 33 BZR (Federal Central Register) entries (as of July 30, 2019) and has fraudulently accepted the position of managing director / liquidator at T + M Agrar-Objekt GmbH in 2014/2016 when he was just 8 months in prison without parole was convicted, this should have been reported to the notary according to Sections 283 to 283d StGB and his appointment as liquidator should have been rejected.

 

Demonstrated further that because of scattering of duty condemned by the Bar Association Freiburg on January 8, 2021 RA Dr. Christoph René Schäfers, who carried out fraudulent joint transactions with Mr. Sehr at the expense of the Fritz family. RA Dr. As Mr. Fritz's lawyer, Schäfers was also the person making the recommendation and the reputation of Mr. Sehr, with whom he planned and carried out joint crimes after termination of his mandate, despite his known termination without notice.

 

That RA Dr. Schäfers was never allowed to accept a mandate from Mr. Sehr on behalf of T + M because of party betrayal, is another blatant breach of professional duty.

 

The notice of termination was served on Mr Sehr by a bailiff. For the Bühl District Court and the bailiff, it was completely unproblematic to successfully send this confirmation of delivery to the Swiss address of Mr. Holger Fritz by post, as Mr. Fritz always had addresses that could be delivered according to the law, without interruption, without objection, without violation of the law. til today.

 

Mr. Nikolaus Sehr has confirmed his dismissal several times with effect from April 13, 2016 , also to lawyers, especially Dr. Schäfers, who received this notice of termination directly in his office. However, Mr. Sehr continued to appear on behalf of the GmbH and, in lieu of an oath, Ms. Böllinger signed various false testimony. With RA Dr. Schäfers has undertaken the transfer of debts to T + M Agrar -objekt GmbH from third parties without a legal basis and without an underlying legal transaction, in order to enable this to be titled by default judgment. For this favor, Mr. Sehr was among others the debtor community of RA Dr. Schäfers rewarded.

 

As an alternative, deliveries would also have been possible to Mr. Fritz's mandated lawyers, which he had throughout, but this was not wanted by the debtor community Sehr, Böllinger, Bayer, Schäfers, etc., in order to, for example, get default judgments on this criminal act. Since it was a structured community of action with the aim of the success of the planned transfer of assets, with one head as the ordering management level, one speaks of a criminal organization .

 

The assets of the Fritz family were too tempting, which Mr. Sehr stated in his affidavit as cash assets in the cash register of T + M Agrar -objekt GmbH at € 300,000.00 - mind you:

 

2.5 months after the termination without notice, effectively received by bailiffs and repeatedly confirmed in writing by him.

 

Compliance with laws - not for Sehr, Böllinger, Bayer, Schäfers & Co.

 

Because according to § 35 GmbHG, if the managing director is dismissed without notice, the shareholder is represented until a new managing director is appointed:

 

Section 35 GmbHG - Representation of the company

(1) The company is represented by the managing directors in and out of court. If a company does not have a managing director (lack of leadership), the company is represented by the shareholders in the event that declarations of intent are made towards it or that documents are served.

 

The sole shareholder was always Mr. Holger Fritz, who is supposedly hiding :).

 

Where 's the fortune?

 

Where are the horses?

 

Why are the sales contracts for the horses not presented?

 

Why weren't the suppliers paid?

 

Why does Mr. Sehr refuse to hand over the accounting documents?

 

Why didn't he draw up the balance sheet?

 

In any case, Heinz Faßbender received from Mr. Sehr; under its betrayal of secrets according to §§ 17, 23 GeschGehG and 85 GmbHG (§ 85 violation of the duty of confidentiality); Business documents from his management activity , with the help of the StA Baden-Baden, so his assignment of guilt, which Faßbender now personally attributes to Mr. Holger Fritz, knowing full well that this untrue factual assertion, thus criminal act ... for Heinz Faßbender nothing new and also uninteresting - He does not believe in compliance with the law, the goal of his paying clients is decisive.

 

In October 2019, the "journalist" Faßbender wanted Mr Fritz to pay € 4,000 for reporting on the public animal welfare process at the Rastatt group. Up until then, Mr. Fritz had never heard of Faßbender, who "sold himself" to AGDir Felder by email as the "head of duty". Mr. Fritz reported this violation of press law because of attempted reporting manipulation and attempted bribery * to the presumably inactive EOAA Helmut Schäfer .

 

The character assassination campaign that began in 2019 and started with particular intensity on 8.2.21 - on behalf of third parties: Sabine Ludewig, Uta Böllinger, Bernd Seith, and others, as witnesses on oath have now affirmed, will have consequences.

 

Attorney Dr. Schäfers, for whom his own investigation has been carried out, has, however, had to report three liability cases in the party-advising matters of Mr. Fritz to his liability insurer with a total volume of € 1,400,000 - and Mr. Fritz is not the only injured client.

 

* Bribery - even the attempt is punishable

Suppliers are liable to prosecution in the case of advantageous offers to buyers even if the buyers do not notice these offers or reject them immediately . Attempting bribery alone will result in criminal prosecution. For a criminal offense, the actual exchange of advantages for preferential treatment is not necessary.

 

Three case studies on Heinz Faßbender:

 

case 1

He does not stop at minors and refuses to implement the request for deletion of his father Holger Fritz of 8 February 2021 and to publish the relevant comment.

 

On his disparagement website, he only allows comments that contain negative things about his father Holger Fritz and applaud his fake news in the frenzy of the mob, such as Rainer Hümmelink , who has not yet paid his debts to Mr. Holger Fritz.

 

Case 2:

But the hate reporter also uses the names of Volker Hoffmann and Klaus Overhoff without limits, individually or in combination, for example to have tickets of € 30 transferred to others.

 

Here are the documents of the current case from November 2020 to January 2021, in which the do-gooder Heinz Faßbender intentionally abusively used Klaus Overhoff as a driver:

 

Document 1

Document 2

Document 3

Document 4

 

This is just another of numerous examples of the "nameless" identity swindle reporter, how he plays along badly to his fellow human beings because of a € 30 parking violation. Faßbender, who markets himself as a kind of "Robin Hood" for self-devised "victims", is not of interest to Faßbender.

 

Case 3:

But he is also up to mischief in Baden-Baden and did not pay TT Technology Transfer UG's vehicle bill in 2019 and left the 25-year-old managing director Julia Ludewig on her debts, which then led the strategy consultancy Freiherr von Rügersgrün, who was already mandated by GF Ludewig instructed the reporter to ask Faßbender for payment and finally waived after part of the transfer was made. Even the unpaid 3-week accommodation costs in Burgstrasse 1 in Baden-Baden (EG), which the documentary filmmaker Volker Hoffmann then interpreted by charging his labor, has not been returned to him to this day. This is probably one of the reasons for the personal attacks by the "reporter" Faßbender on Volker Hoffmann, whom he publicly disparages with his slander, together with Mr. Fritz.

 

Example of a WhatsApp message from the cheated and letter to Kfz Hurrle in Gaggenau:

 

Document 1

 

Sources: research, witness interviews, public trial observation

Contact
Der Fall Heinz Hermann Faßbender: Über mich
Feuer

To person

The Heinz Hermann Faßbender case

 

---> Explanation <---

from 02.26.2021 from

Klaus Overhoff &

Volker Hoffmann

 

---> Explanation <---

from 12/14 March 2021 from

Klaus Overhoff

 

Heinz%20Fa%C3%9Fbender%20ohne%20LG%20Gie

T:   02268 - 90 74 76

M: 0152 - 3368 7417

Kürten - Rastatt

3 h 44 min (334 km) on the A5 and A3

 

separate Carl-Benz-Strasse 20 in 76437 Rastatt from Kastanienweg 23 in 51515 Kürten, where a "reporter" Heinz Hermann Faßbender lives in a cul-de-sac, married to Michael Narang. The homosexual Heinz Faßbender is said to have a son by the name of Christian Faßbender, because he sometimes indicates in his place in the exchange of identity when it comes to open claims or hiding his home addresses, in other words: mailbox addresses.

 

Or is it about this Christian Faßbender , into whose identity Heinz Faßbender slips when he, abusing press law, wants to escape the prosecution authorities?

 

For decades he has appeared under the aliases Max Maier, Christian Faßbender and numerous Polish names that he randomly picks up on the Internet in order not to have to pay his traffic fines, for example.

 

At the police station in Kürten, police chief inspector Jürgen Farsen , he has been well known for years, but also at the public prosecutor's office in Baden-Baden , where he was for years in Weinbergstrasse. 7 reported where he never lived, even registered his car there, ... he is said to be on record with the public prosecutor's offices in Hamburg, Cologne, Heilbronn, etc.

 

Now this "busy reporter" in Rastatt has taken on the party member of the Greens Uta Böllinger in order to degrade the father of their daughter on his website and in the Rastatt Facebook group to the worst. He questions the word "together".

 

What does this mean exactly?

 

Faßbender has been working closely with the incitement journeyman Nikolaus Sehr, Erlenstrasse 13, 76547 Sinzheim, since November 2019, who in turn appeared in 2016 as the inciting journeyman of Ms. Böllinger, according to Mr. Sehr's multiple own confirmation, and demonstrably falsely claims that Horse property of the Fritz family moved via the Moseshof in Dill would have belonged to T + M Agrar-Objekt GmbH, which is in liquidation.

 

For this purpose, Mr. Sehr submitted a false affidavit in this regard to the Bühl District Court on June 1, 2016. The horses were never owned by the company, as can be seen from the balance sheets and contracts.

 

As agreed with Ms. Uta Böllinger in 2016, after several confirmations by Mr. Sehr, Mr. Holger Fritz was always untruely declared as homeless by the activists by imputing mailbox addresses. One of the underlying intentions was z. B. to get titles about default judgments, since Mr. Holger Fritz never learned of a complaint about this criminal practice.

 

In some cases the activists succeeded in doing this, but the courts corrected this after clarifying the facts. The fraud statements by Sehr, Böllinger, Bayer, Schäfers, etc., were either revoked or no longer played a role.

 

All of this is of no interest to character assassination experts such as Faßbender, Sehr, Böllinger, Bayer, Schäfers & Co.

 

These activists can never pay for their damage done - they are envious prone nots - make this tool available as well as publish: "Should the Fritz but complain, we have already been lifted finger, have nothing and doing the Baden justice nothing," said Statements from the perpetrator and debtor community.

 

With this criminal trick, these envious people wanted to and have unrestrainedly enriched themselves with the property of the Fritz family, which was achieved, for example, with the sale of horse property worth over € 300,000.00 as stolen goods.

 

It also shows the cold feeling of these fences, who unscrupulously moved the horses of Mr. Fritz's children.

 

As is the case with habenichtsen, Holger Fritz's complaint was not pursued by the StA Baden-Baden because of, for example, embezzlement of a horse's assets of over € 300,000 , as the instigator Nikolaus Sehr can expect a conviction for other offenses. Even a property offense of over € 800,000.00, for T + M Agrar -objekt GmbH alone, does not matter - at least for the StA Baden-Baden!

 

If one were to collect the assets of all instigators and incitement fellows, including the newly added inciting fellow Fassbender, plus Ser. Income of the group over 30 years of fictional basis, this debtor Community (Very, Fassbender, Böllinger, Lihl, Bayer, Ludewig, etc.) nowhere near able to ever make up for the damage caused.

 

For example, Mr Sehr has a criminal record with 33 BZR (Federal Central Register) entries (as of July 30, 2019) and has fraudulently accepted the position of managing director / liquidator at T + M Agrar-Objekt GmbH in 2014/2016 when he was just 8 months in prison without parole was convicted, this should have been reported to the notary according to Sections 283 to 283d StGB and his appointment as liquidator should have been rejected.

 

Demonstrated further that because of scattering of duty condemned by the Bar Association Freiburg on January 8, 2021 RA Dr. Christoph René Schäfers, who carried out fraudulent joint transactions with Mr. Sehr at the expense of the Fritz family. RA Dr. As Mr. Fritz's lawyer, Schäfers was also the person making the recommendation and the reputation of Mr. Sehr, with whom he planned and carried out joint crimes after termination of his mandate, despite his known termination without notice.

 

That RA Dr. Schäfers was never allowed to accept a mandate from Mr. Sehr on behalf of T + M because of party betrayal, is another blatant breach of professional duty.

 

The notice of termination was served on Mr Sehr by a bailiff. For the Bühl District Court and the bailiff, it was completely unproblematic to successfully send this confirmation of delivery to the Swiss address of Mr. Holger Fritz by post, as Mr. Fritz always had addresses that could be delivered according to the law, without interruption, without objection, without violation of the law. til today.

 

Mr. Nikolaus Sehr has confirmed his dismissal several times with effect from April 13, 2016 , also to lawyers, especially Dr. Schäfers, who received this notice of termination directly in his office. However, Mr. Sehr continued to appear on behalf of the GmbH and, in lieu of an oath, Ms. Böllinger signed various false testimony. With RA Dr. Schäfers has undertaken the transfer of debts to T + M Agrar -objekt GmbH from third parties without a legal basis and without an underlying legal transaction, in order to enable this to be titled by default judgment. For this favor, Mr. Sehr was among others the debtor community of RA Dr. Schäfers rewarded.

 

As an alternative, deliveries would also have been possible to Mr. Fritz's mandated lawyers, which he had throughout, but this was not wanted by the debtor community Sehr, Böllinger, Bayer, Schäfers, etc., in order to, for example, get default judgments on this criminal act. Since it was a structured community of action with the aim of the success of the planned transfer of assets, with one head as the ordering management level, one speaks of a criminal organization .

 

The assets of the Fritz family were too tempting, which Mr. Sehr stated in his affidavit as cash assets in the cash register of T + M Agrar -objekt GmbH at € 300,000.00 - mind you:

 

2.5 months after the termination without notice, effectively received by bailiffs and repeatedly confirmed in writing by him.

 

Compliance with laws - not for Sehr, Böllinger, Bayer, Schäfers & Co.

 

Because according to § 35 GmbHG, if the managing director is dismissed without notice, the shareholder is represented until a new managing director is appointed:

 

Section 35 GmbHG - Representation of the company

(1) The company is represented by the managing directors in and out of court. If a company does not have a managing director (lack of leadership), the company is represented by the shareholders in the event that declarations of intent are made towards it or that documents are served.

 

The sole shareholder was always Mr. Holger Fritz, who is supposedly hiding :).

 

Where 's the fortune?

 

Where are the horses?

 

Why are the sales contracts for the horses not presented?

 

Why weren't the suppliers paid?

 

Why does Mr. Sehr refuse to hand over the accounting documents?

 

Why didn't he draw up the balance sheet?

 

In any case, Heinz Faßbender received from Mr. Sehr; under its betrayal of secrets according to §§ 17, 23 GeschGehG and 85 GmbHG (§ 85 violation of the duty of confidentiality); Business documents from his management activity , with the help of the StA Baden-Baden, so his assignment of guilt, which Faßbender now personally attributes to Mr. Holger Fritz, knowing full well that this untrue factual assertion, thus criminal act ... for Heinz Faßbender nothing new and also uninteresting - He does not believe in compliance with the law, the goal of his paying clients is decisive.

 

In October 2019, the "journalist" Faßbender wanted Mr Fritz to pay € 4,000 for reporting on the public animal welfare process at the Rastatt group. Up until then, Mr. Fritz had never heard of Faßbender, who "sold himself" to AGDir Felder by email as the "head of duty". Mr. Fritz reported this violation of press law because of attempted reporting manipulation and attempted bribery * to the presumably inactive EOAA Helmut Schäfer .

 

The character assassination campaign that began in 2019 and started with particular intensity on 8.2.21 - on behalf of third parties: Sabine Ludewig, Uta Böllinger, Bernd Seith, and others, as witnesses on oath have now affirmed, will have consequences.

 

Attorney Dr. Schäfers, for whom his own investigation has been carried out, has, however, had to report three liability cases in the party-advising matters of Mr. Fritz to his liability insurer with a total volume of € 1,400,000 - and Mr. Fritz is not the only injured client.

 

* Bribery - even the attempt is punishable

Suppliers are liable to prosecution in the case of advantageous offers to buyers even if the buyers do not notice these offers or reject them immediately . Attempting bribery alone will result in criminal prosecution. For a criminal offense, the actual exchange of advantages for preferential treatment is not necessary.

 

Three case studies on Heinz Faßbender:

 

case 1

He does not stop at minors and refuses to implement the request for deletion of his father Holger Fritz of 8 February 2021 and to publish the relevant comment.

 

On his disparagement website, he only allows comments that contain negative things about his father Holger Fritz and applaud his fake news in the frenzy of the mob, such as Rainer Hümmelink , who has not yet paid his debts to Mr. Holger Fritz.

 

Case 2:

But the hate reporter also uses the names of Volker Hoffmann and Klaus Overhoff without limits, individually or in combination, for example to have tickets of € 30 transferred to others.

 

Here are the documents of the current case from November 2020 to January 2021, in which the do-gooder Heinz Faßbender intentionally abusively used Klaus Overhoff as a driver:

 

Document 1

Document 2

Document 3

Document 4

 

This is just another of numerous examples of the "nameless" identity swindle reporter, how he plays along badly to his fellow human beings because of a € 30 parking violation. Faßbender, who markets himself as a kind of "Robin Hood" for self-devised "victims", is not of interest to Faßbender.

 

Case 3:

But he is also up to mischief in Baden-Baden and did not pay TT Technology Transfer UG's vehicle bill in 2019 and left the 25-year-old managing director Julia Ludewig on her debts, which then led the strategy consultancy Freiherr von Rügersgrün, who was already mandated by GF Ludewig instructed the reporter to ask Faßbender for payment and finally waived after part of the transfer was made. Even the unpaid 3-week accommodation costs in Burgstrasse 1 in Baden-Baden (EG), which the documentary filmmaker Volker Hoffmann then interpreted by charging his labor, has not been returned to him to this day. This is probably one of the reasons for the personal attacks by the "reporter" Faßbender on Volker Hoffmann, whom he publicly disparages with his slander, together with Mr. Fritz.

 

Example of a WhatsApp message from the cheated and letter to Kfz Hurrle in Gaggenau:

 

Document 1

 

Sources: research, witness interviews, public trial observation

Contact
bottom of page